Based on the configuration shown in the figure below, it can be known that R4 has () interfaces advertised into IS-IS?
As shown in the figure, as shown, as the AS10 has two paths to access THEA1, the optimal route passed from the 4S23 by default is now sprinkled with S00 to ass4O The odds belt wins even more worrying. Therefore, in the R2 configuration as follows, after the completion of the coordination, it is found that the most worrying route has not changed, and some operations can be adjusted to make the configuration
??[ R2]jpas-path-fiter l permit "4D0& [2]pouteplicy med permit node 10[R2-routepolicyli- match aspath-ilterl[R2-oute-policylapplycoast.20
The switch SWA and SWB are connected together by 2 Ethernet links, where the switch SWA has the following interface configuration:
As shown in the figure, which of the following options satisfies two routers to establish an ISIS neighbor?( Single choice questions).
As shown in the figure, all routing diagrams declare the loopback address in OSPF, where R2 does not return the address is 10022/32, it is advisable to tell AraD. The R3 loopback address is 10033/321001.1.0/24 external routing, in order to reduce the burden on the RI router, the configuration command is as follows:( Multiple choice questions)[Rlip ip-prefix 1 permit 001.1.024 [RLIJospfl [RL-ospf-1]filter-policy ip-prefix l import please ask the following description is correct?