Get SAP C_TS414_2023 Exam Practice Questions - Real and Updated

Answer : A, D

Outbound quality inspections (e.g., inspection type 10) in Sales and Distribution (SD) occur for deliveries:

The Inspection is Skipped (A): If no inspection type (e.g., 10) is active in the material master or quality info record: SD, the inspection can be skipped, a valid option in standard SAP.

The Inspection Occurs Before the Goods Issue is Posted (D): For inspection type 10, the inspection lot is created with the delivery (before goods issue, transaction VL02N), allowing inspection before stock is moved (standard process).

After Release of the Sales Order (B): Inspections are tied to deliveries, not sales order release.

After Creation of the Sales Order (C): Inspection lots are not created at SO creation; they require a delivery.

Thus, 'The inspection is skipped' and 'The inspection occurs before the goods issue is posted' are the correct answers.

Answer : A, B

The Engineering Workbench (EWB) in SAP S/4HANA is a powerful tool for managing task lists, including inspection plans, in a structured and efficient way. Working areas in the EWB define the focus or scope of what users can edit or view during inspection planning. These settings are mandatory to streamline workflows and ensure the correct level of detail is maintained:

Header (A): The header level refers to the overall inspection plan (e.g., plan group and group counter). A working area focused on the header allows users to manage high-level attributes like validity dates or usage. This is a standard focus in EWB (transaction CEWB).

Operation (B): Operations within an inspection plan define the steps or activities (e.g., 'Measure dimension'). A working area focused on operations allows detailed planning at this level, including assigning control keys or work centers. This is another standard focus in EWB.

Inspection Characteristic (C): While inspection characteristics (e.g., specific measurements) are part of an operation, they are not a standalone focus for a working area in EWB. They are managed within the operation context, not as a separate working area.

Classification (D): Classification is used for categorizing objects (e.g., materials) but is not a focus for working areas in inspection planning within EWB. It's unrelated to this context.

Thus, 'Header' and 'Operation' are the correct focuses, aligning with EWB's structure for inspection planning.

Answer : A, B, E

Automatic usage decision (UD) in SAP QM (configured via transaction QA16) requires:

No Inspection Characteristic Was Rejected (A): All characteristics must be accepted (e.g., valuation 'A') for the system to proceed automatically (SPRO > QM > Quality Inspection > Usage Decision > Define Automatic UD).

All Required Inspection Characteristics Were Confirmed and Completed (B): Required characteristics (marked in the plan) must have results recorded and valuated (status RREC).

There Are No Defect Records for the Inspection Lot (E): Open defects block automatic UD, ensuring quality issues are resolved first.

Activity Recording Finished for All Operations (C): Activity confirmation (e.g., time) is optional and not a prerequisite.

All Inspection Operations Completed (D): Operations completion isn't mandatory; characteristic completion is sufficient.

Thus, 'A, B, E' are the correct answers.

Answer : D

Partner determination in QM notifications (e.g., transaction QM01) assigns partners (e.g., responsible person) via:

Assignment to the Notification Type (D): The partner determination procedure is assigned in Customizing (SPRO > QM > Quality Notifications > Notification Creation > Define Notification Types), linking specific partner roles (e.g., coordinator) to a notification type (e.g., Q1 for customer complaints). This is the standard approach.

Notification Origin (A): Origins (e.g., 01 for GR) don't directly assign partner procedures.

Material Type (B): Material types are MM settings, not linked to QM partner determination.

Material Master (C): Material master doesn't store partner procedures for notifications.

Thus, 'Assignment to the notification type' is the correct answer.

Answer : B

Transferring inspection results to a batch characteristic in SAP QM (e.g., during results recording) requires linking QM and batch management (LO-BM). The prerequisite in inspection planning is:

Assignment of a Class Characteristic to a Master Inspection Characteristic (B): To transfer results, the MIC (transaction QS21) must be linked to a class characteristic (transaction CT04) used in the batch class (transaction CL01). This is configured in the MIC by assigning the class characteristic, enabling the system to update batch values (e.g., potency) from inspection results. This is a standard prerequisite (SPRO > Quality Management > Inspection Planning > Basic Data > MIC).

Assignment of a Class Characteristic to the Inspection Specification (A): Inspection specifications (e.g., material specs) don't directly link to class characteristics for this purpose; the link is via MICs.

Assignment of an Inspection Characteristic to the Inspection Specification (C): This refers to planning setup but doesn't address batch transfer specifically.

Assignment of an Inspection Method to the Inspection Characteristic (D): Methods guide execution, not batch value transfer.

Thus, 'Assignment of a class characteristic to a master inspection characteristic' is the correct answer.