Get VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Dumps

Answer : A, D

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, requirements are classified as functional (what the system must do) or non-functional (how the system performs or operates). Functional requirements describe specific capabilities or behaviors, while non-functional requirements address qualities like performance, security, or constraints. Let's classify each:

Option A: REQ01 - The application server must handle at least 30,000 transactions per second

This is correct. This is a functional requirement because it specifies what the application server (a component of the solution) must do---process a defined transaction volume. It's a capability the system must deliver, directly tied to workload performance within the VCF environment.

Option B: REQ02 - The design must meet ISO 27001 information security standards

This is a non-functional requirement. ISO 27001 addresses security qualities (e.g., confidentiality, integrity), defining how the system should operate securely, not what it does. It's a compliance and operational constraint, not a functional capability.

Option C: REQ03 - The storage network should maintain a minimum latency of 12 milliseconds before path failover

This is a non-functional requirement. It specifies a performance threshold (latency) and reliability behavior (failover), describing how the storage network should perform, not a specific function it must provide.

Option D: REQ04 - The staging environment should utilize a secondary third-party data center

This is correct. This is a functional requirement because it defines what the solution must include---a staging environment located in a specific secondary data center. It's a capability or structural requirement of the VCF deployment, dictating a functional aspect of the system.

Option E: REQ05 - Planned maintenance must be performed outside the hours of 8 AM to 8 PM GMT

This is a non-functional requirement. It's an operational constraint on when maintenance occurs, affecting availability and manageability, not a specific function the system must perform.

Conclusion:

The two functional requirements are REQ01 (A) and REQ04 (D). They define what the VCF solution must do (handle transactions, include a staging environment), aligning with VMware's design methodology for functional specifications.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Functional vs. Non-Functional Requirements)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Requirements Classification)

Answer : C

VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 offers various architecture models (Consolidated, Standard) and topologies (Single/Multiple Instance, Single/Multiple Availability Zones) to meet different requirements. The client's needs---high security, isolation, six vSAN-ready nodes, and no additional budget---guide the architect's choice. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: Single Instance - Multiple Availability Zone Standard architecture model

This model uses a single VCF instance with separate Management and VI Workload Domains across multiple availability zones (AZs) for resilience. It requires at least four nodes per AZ (minimum for vSAN HA), meaning six nodes are insufficient for two AZs (eight nodes minimum). It also increases complexity and doesn't inherently enhance isolation from other infrastructures. This option is impractical given the node constraint.

Option B: Single Instance Consolidated architecture model

The Consolidated model runs management and workload components on a single cluster (minimum four nodes, up to eight typically). With six nodes, this is feasible and capacity-efficient, but it compromises isolation because management and user workloads share the same infrastructure. For a ''highly secure'' and ''isolated'' project, mixing workloads increases the attack surface and risks compliance, making this less suitable despite fitting the node count.

Option C: Single Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model

This is the correct answer. The Standard model separates management (minimum four nodes) and VI Workload Domains (minimum three nodes, but often four for HA) within a single VCF instance and AZ. With six nodes, the architect can allocate four to the Management Domain and two to a VI Workload Domain (or adjust based on capacity). A single AZ fits the budget constraint (no extra nodes), and isolation is achieved by dedicating the VCF instance to this project, separate from other infrastructures. The high-density vSAN nodes support both domains, and security is enhanced by logical separation of management and workloads, aligning with VCF 5.2 best practices for secure deployments.

Option D: Multiple Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model

Multiple VCF instances (e.g., one for management, one for workloads) in a single AZ require separate node pools, each with a minimum of four nodes for vSAN. Six nodes cannot support two instances (eight nodes minimum), making this option unfeasible given the budget and hardware constraints.

Conclusion:

The Single Instance - Single Availability Zone Standard architecture model (Option C) is the best fit. It uses six nodes efficiently (e.g., four for Management, two for Workload), ensures isolation by dedicating the instance to the project, and meets security needs through logical separation, all within the budget limitation.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Architecture Models and Topologies)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Sizing and Isolation Considerations)

Answer : C

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design qualities (or non-functional requirements) categorize how the solution meets its objectives. The requirements---''deploying 50 concurrent workloads'' and ''provisioning each service within 6 hours''---must be classified under a quality that reflects their intent. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: Availability

Availability ensures the solution is accessible and operational when needed (e.g., uptime percentage). While deploying workloads and provisioning services assume availability, the requirements focus on speed and capacity (50 concurrent workloads, 6-hour limit), not uptime or fault tolerance. This quality doesn't directly address the stated needs, making it incorrect.

Option B: Recoverability

Recoverability addresses the ability to restore services after a failure (e.g., disaster recovery). The requirements don't mention failure scenarios, backups, or restoration---they focus on provisioning speed and concurrency during normal operation. Recoverability is unrelated to these operational metrics, so this is incorrect.

Option C: Performance

This is the correct answer. Performance measures how well the solution executes tasks, including speed, throughput, and capacity. In VCF 5.2:

''Deploying 50 concurrent workloads'' is a throughput requirement, ensuring the system can handle multiple deployments simultaneously.

''Each service does not take longer than 6 hours to provision'' is a latency or response time requirement, setting a performance boundary.

Both align with the performance quality, which governs resource efficiency and user experience in provisioning workflows (e.g., via SDDC Manager or Aria Automation). This classification fits VMware's design framework.

Option D: Manageability

Manageability focuses on ease of administration, monitoring, and maintenance (e.g., automation, UI simplicity). While provisioning workloads involves management, the requirements emphasize how fast and how many---performance metrics---not the ease of managing the process. Manageability might apply to tools enabling this, but it's not the primary quality here.

Conclusion:

The design quality to classify these requirements is Performance (Option C). It directly reflects the solution's ability to handle 50 concurrent workloads and provision services within 6 hours, aligning with VCF 5.2's focus on operational efficiency.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Design Qualities)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Performance Considerations)

Answer : A, C

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, assumptions are statements taken as true for design purposes, but they introduce risks if unverified. The architect must identify risks---potential issues that could impact the solution's success---stemming from these assumptions and include them in the design document. Let's evaluate each option against the assumptions:

Option A: The physical network infrastructure may not provide sufficient bandwidth to support the user workloads

This is correct. The assumption states that the physical network infrastructure ''will not exceed the maximum latency requirements,'' but it doesn't address bandwidth. In VCF, user workloads (e.g., in VI Workload Domains) rely on network bandwidth for performance (e.g., vSAN traffic, VM communication). Insufficient bandwidth could degrade workload performance or scalability, despite meeting latency requirements. This is a direct risk tied to an unaddressed aspect of the network assumption, making it a necessary inclusion.

Option B: The customer may not have sufficient data center power, cooling, and physical rack space available

This is incorrect as a mandatory risk in this context. The assumption explicitly states that ''the data center offers sufficient power, cooling, and rack space'' for the required hosts. While it's possible this could be untrue, the risk is already implicitly covered by questioning the assumption's validity. Including this risk would be redundant unless specific evidence (e.g., unverified data center specs) suggests doubt, which isn't provided. Other risks (A, C) are more immediate and distinct.

Option C: The customer may not have licensing that covers all of the physical cores the design requires

This is correct. The assumption states that ''the customer will provide sufficient licensing for the scale of the new solution.'' In VCF 5.2, licensing (e.g., vSphere, vSAN, NSX) is core-based, and misjudging the number of physical cores (e.g., due to host specs or scale) could lead to insufficient licenses. This risk directly challenges the assumption's accuracy---if the customer's licensing doesn't match the design's core count, deployment could stall or incur unplanned costs. It's a critical risk to document.

Option D: The assumptions may not be approved by a majority of the customer stakeholders before the solution is deployed

This is incorrect. While stakeholder approval is important, this is a process-related risk, not a technical or operational risk tied to the assumptions' content. The VMware design methodology focuses risks on solution impact (e.g., performance, capacity), not procedural uncertainties like consensus. This risk is too vague and outside the scope of the assumptions' direct implications.

Conclusion:

The two risks the architect must include are:

A: Insufficient network bandwidth (not covered by the latency assumption).

C: Inadequate licensing for physical cores (directly tied to the licensing assumption).

These align with VCF 5.2 design principles, ensuring potential gaps in network performance and licensing are flagged for validation or mitigation.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Risk Identification)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Network and Licensing Considerations)

Answer : C, E

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) enhances the platform by providing self-service, automation, and multi-site management capabilities. The architect must determine which requirements (REQ01-REQ05) are directly satisfied by the design decisions (DD01 and DD02). Let's evaluate each requirement against the decisions:

Design Decisions:

DD01: Clustered deployment of Aria Automation

A clustered deployment ensures high availability and scalability of Aria Automation, supporting multiple users and workloads with resilience.

DD02: Integration between Aria Automation and multiple geo-located vCenter Servers

This enables centralized management of distributed vSphere environments (e.g., across availability zones or regions), facilitating network and resource orchestration.

Evaluation of Requirements:

Option A: REQ01 - The solution must support the private cloud cybersecurity industry and local standards and controls

This requirement focuses on cybersecurity and compliance (e.g., encryption, access controls, auditing). While Aria Automation supports role-based access control (RBAC) and integrates with secure VCF components, neither DD01 nor DD02 directly addresses cybersecurity standards or local controls. These are typically met by VCF's baseline security features (e.g., NSX, vSphere hardening), not specifically by Aria Automation's clustering or vCenter integration. Thus, REQ01 is not directly satisfied by the stated decisions.

Option B: REQ02 - The solution must ensure that the cloud services are transitioned to operation teams

This requirement implies operational handoff, training, or automation to enable operations teams to manage services. Aria Automation's clustering (DD01) improves reliability, and vCenter integration (DD02) centralizes management, but neither explicitly ensures a transition process (e.g., documentation, runbooks). This is more about operational processes than the technical decisions provided, so REQ02 is not directly satisfied.

Option C: REQ03 - The solution must provide a self-service portal

This is correct. Aria Automation's primary function in VCF 5.2 is to provide a self-service portal for users to provision and manage resources (e.g., VMs, applications). A clustered deployment (DD01) ensures the portal's availability and scalability, supporting multiple users concurrently. Integration with vCenter Servers (DD02) enhances its capability to deploy resources across sites, but DD01 alone directly satisfies REQ03 by enabling a robust self-service experience. Thus, REQ03 is satisfied.

Option D: REQ04 - The solution must provide the ability to consume storage based on policies

This requirement involves policy-driven storage management (e.g., vSAN storage policies). Aria Automation supports storage policies via integration with vSphere/vSAN, allowing users to define storage profiles (e.g., performance, capacity). However, this capability is inherent to vSphere/vSAN integration, not uniquely tied to clustering (DD01) or geo-located vCenter integration (DD02). While Aria Automation facilitates this, the design decisions don't specifically address storage policy consumption as a primary outcome, making REQ04 less directly satisfied compared to others.

Option E: REQ05 - The solution should provide the ability to extend networks between different availability zones

This is correct. Integrating Aria Automation with multiple geo-located vCenter Servers (DD02) enables management of distributed environments, including network extension across availability zones. In VCF 5.2, this leverages NSX-T for Layer 2 stretching (e.g., via HCX or NSX Federation), orchestrated through Aria Automation. DD02 directly supports this by connecting disparate vCenters, allowing network policies and extensions to be applied across zones. Clustering (DD01) supports scalability but isn't the key factor---DD02 is the primary enabler. Thus, REQ05 is satisfied.

Conclusion:

The two requirements satisfied by the design decisions are:

REQ03 (C): A clustered Aria Automation deployment (DD01) directly provides a reliable self-service portal.

REQ05 (E): Integration with multiple geo-located vCenter Servers (DD02) enables network extension across availability zones.

While REQ04 is partially supported, REQ03 and REQ05 are the most directly tied to the stated decisions in the VCF 5.2 context.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Aria Automation Integration)

VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Documentation (integrated in VCF 5.2): Self-Service Portal and Multi-Site Management

VMware NSX-T 3.2 Reference Design (integrated in VCF 5.2): Network Extension Capabilities