Get VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Practice Questions - Real and Updated

Answer : A

The requirements focus on trust, encryption, and lifecycle management for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 solution. VCF leverages SDDC Manager, vCenter Server, NSX, and ESXi hosts as core management components, and their security and manageability are critical. Let's evaluate each option against the requirements:

Option A: Integrate the SDDC Manager with a supported 3rd-party certificate authority (CA)

This is the correct answer. In VCF 5.2, integrating SDDC Manager with a 3rd-party CA (e.g., Microsoft CA, OpenSSL) allows it to manage and deploy trusted certificates across all management components (e.g., vCenter, NSX Manager, ESXi hosts). This ensures:

Trusted administrative access: Certificates from a trusted CA secure administrative interfaces (e.g., HTTPS access to SDDC Manager and vCenter), ensuring authenticated and verified connections.

Encrypted communications: All management component interactions (e.g., API calls, UI access) use TLS with CA-signed certificates, encrypting data in transit.

Lifecycle management enhancement: SDDC Manager automates certificate lifecycle operations (e.g., issuance, renewal, replacement), reducing manual effort and improving operational efficiency.

The VMware Cloud Foundation documentation explicitly supports this integration as a best practice for security and scalability, fulfilling all three requirements comprehensively.

Option B: Integrate the SDDC Manager with the vCenter Server in VMCA mode

This is incorrect. The vCenter Server's VMware Certificate Authority (VMCA) can issue certificates for vSphere components (e.g., ESXi hosts, vCenter itself), but it operates within the vSphere domain, not across the broader VCF stack. SDDC Manager requires a higher-level CA integration to manage certificates for all components (including NSX and itself). VMCA mode doesn't extend trust to SDDC Manager or NSX Manager natively, nor does it enhance lifecycle management across the entire VCF solution---it's limited to vSphere. This option fails to fully address the requirements.

Option C: Write a PowerCLI script to run on all virtual appliances and force a redirection on port 443

This is incorrect. Forcing redirection to port 443 (HTTPS) via a PowerCLI script might enable encrypted communication for some components, but it's a manual, ad-hoc solution that:

Doesn't ensure trusted access (no mention of certificate trust).

Doesn't integrate with a CA for certificate management.

Contradicts lifecycle enhancement, as it requires ongoing manual intervention rather than automation.

This approach is not scalable or supported in VCF 5.2 for meeting security requirements.

Option D: Write an Aria Orchestrator Workflow to change the ESXi hosts' certificates in bulk

This is incorrect. While VMware Aria Orchestrator (formerly vRealize Orchestrator) can automate certificate updates for ESXi hosts, it's a partial solution that:

Only addresses ESXi hosts, not all management components (e.g., SDDC Manager, NSX).

Doesn't inherently ensure trust unless tied to a trusted CA (not specified here).

Improves lifecycle management only for ESXi certificates, not the broader VCF stack.

This option lacks the holistic scope required by the question and isn't a native VCF design decision.

Conclusion:

Integrating SDDC Manager with a 3rd-party CA (Option A) is the only design decision that fully satisfies all requirements. It leverages VCF 5.2's built-in certificate management capabilities to ensure trust, encryption, and lifecycle efficiency across the entire solution.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Certificate Management)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Security Design Considerations)

vSphere 7.0U3 Security Configuration Guide (integrated in VCF 5.2): Certificate Authority Integration

Answer : B

Resilience against a single ESXi host failure requires high availability (HA) for management components in VCF. VMware Aria Suite, including Aria Automation, supports HA via clustering. Option B, deploying 'three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered topology,' ensures that if one host fails, the remaining two can maintain service, meeting the requirement directly. A cluster of three nodes is the minimum for HA in Aria Automation, providing fault tolerance within a VCF management domain. Option A (stretched workload domain) is unrelated to management tooling HA, C (Aria Suite Lifecycle clustering) isn't a standard HA feature for that component, and D (load balancer for Operations proxies) addresses a different component and purpose.

Answer : B

Business requirements in VCF articulate organizational objectives that the solution must enable, often focusing on efficiency, cost, or service improvements rather than specific technical implementations. Option B, 'Decrease processing time for service requests by 30%,' is a business requirement as it targets an operational efficiency goal that benefits the customer's service delivery, measurable from a business perspective rather than dictating how the system achieves it. Options A, C, and D---specifying OS compatibility, user capacity, and encryption standards---are technical requirements, as they detail system capabilities or security mechanisms that architects must implement within VCF components like vSphere or NSX. The distinction hinges on intent: B focuses on outcome (speed), while others define system properties.

Answer : A

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design documentation includes assumptions, constraints, requirements, and risks to define the solution's scope and address potential challenges. The scenario provides specific information about workload types and their behavior over time, which the architect must categorize appropriately. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: An assumption that the DB workload resource requirements will remain static

This is the correct answer. An assumption is a statement taken as true without proof, often based on customer-provided information, to guide design planning. The customer explicitly states that ''the DB workloads will stay the same in terms of resources over time.'' Documenting this as an assumption reflects this fact and allows the architect to size the VCF instance with a fixed resource allocation for DB workloads, while planning scalability for other workloads. This aligns with VMware's design methodology for capturing stable baseline conditions.

Option B: A constraint of including the management, DB, and VDI environments

This is incorrect. A constraint is a limitation or restriction imposed on the design, such as existing hardware or policies. The need to support management, VDI, DB, and general workloads is a requirement (what the solution must do), not a limitation. Labeling it a constraint misrepresents its role---it's a design goal, not a restrictive factor. Constraints might include budget or rack space, but this scenario doesn't indicate such limits.

Option C: A requirement consisting of the growth of the general workloads and VDI environment

This is a strong contender but incorrect in this context. A requirement defines what the solution must achieve, and the customer's statement that ''general workloads and VDI environments are expected to grow over the next 3 years'' could be a requirement (e.g., ''The solution must support growth...''). However, the question asks for a single item, and Option A better captures a foundational planning element (static DB workloads) that directly informs sizing. Growth could be a requirement, but it's less immediate than the assumption about DB stability for initial design documentation.

Option D: A risk that the VCF instance may not have enough capacity for growth

This is incorrect as the primary answer. A risk identifies potential issues that could impact success, such as insufficient capacity for growing workloads. While this is a valid concern given VDI and general workload growth, the scenario doesn't provide evidence of immediate capacity limitations---only an expectation of growth. Risks are typically documented after sizing, not as the sole initial inclusion. The assumption about DB workloads is more fundamental to start the design process.

Conclusion:

The architect should include an assumption that the DB workload resource requirements will remain static (Option A). This reflects the customer's explicit statement, establishes a baseline for sizing the Management Domain and Workload Domains, and allows planning for growth elsewhere. While growth (C) and risk (D) are relevant, the assumption is the most immediate and appropriate single item for initial documentation in VCF 5.2.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Design Assumptions and Requirements)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Workload Domain Sizing)

Answer : B, E

A 99.99% SLA requires HA across AZs, and centralized management in VCF implies a single management domain. Option B, 'Configure a stretched L2 VLAN,' ensures management components (e.g., vCenter, NSX Manager) communicate seamlessly across AZs, supporting centralization and redundancy. Option E, 'Choose two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain,' extends the management domain across AZs with low latency (<5ms RTT recommended), achieving HA and meeting the SLA via synchronous replication and failover. Option A contradicts centralization with distinct domains, C isolates components (reducing HA), and D (Live Recovery) is for DR, not primary HA. VCF 5.2 supports stretched clusters for this purpose.