Get Salesforce Plat-Admn-202 Exam Practice Questions - Real and Updated

Answer : D

When deploying from a sandbox on a newer Salesforce version to production on a current version, any components that rely on features not yet available in production will fail.

Change sets do not automatically upgrade production.

All features must be supported in the target org at deployment time.

Salesforce documentation notes that compatibility issues may occur if components use version-specific features, and deployments must be tested against the target org's current version. (Salesforce Help)

A is incorrect because deployments do not automatically wait for production upgrades.

B is partially true, but deployments are possible if features are supported.

C is incorrect; components are not automatically upgraded.

===========

Answer : A

The correct answer is A. A hyperlink to the parent Account of the parent Opportunity.

A formula field can use cross-object references to parent records, and Salesforce states that cross-object formulas can reference fields from objects up to 10 relationships away. Since Opportunity Product relates to Opportunity, and Opportunity relates to Account, a formula on Opportunity Product can reference the parent Opportunity's Account.

Salesforce also supports the HYPERLINK() formula function, which creates a clickable link from specified link text to a specified URL. So a formula field can be configured to create a hyperlink to the Account record related to the parent Opportunity.

B is incorrect because formula field data types do not include Rich Text Area as a formula return type.

C is incorrect because Salesforce restricts formulas from using long text area, encrypted, or Description fields.

D is not the best verified answer because large cross-object concatenations can run into formula relationship, size, or complexity limits, while the clearly supported Platform App Builder use case here is the cross-object HYPERLINK formula.

===========

Answer : D

This question is testing the classic Salesforce Process Builder automation best practice, not a generic Flow-only rule. Salesforce's official process design guidance states that an org should have only one record-change process per object. The reason is simple: every time a record is created or updated, Salesforce evaluates the record-change processes for that object. If an object has multiple record-change processes, the automation becomes harder to predict, harder to troubleshoot, and more likely to hit governor limits. Salesforce specifically explains that consolidating automation into one record-change process gives admins a single view of all criteria and actions for that object, reduces duplicated automation overhead, and allows the app builder to control the order of criteria evaluation.

A is not the best exam answer here. In modern Flow architecture, ''one Flow per object'' is often discussed as a design pattern, but it is not the exact best-practice wording being tested by this Platform App Builder-style question. Salesforce Flow design is more nuanced today because record-triggered flows can vary by trigger timing and event. B is wrong because validation rules should be separated by validation requirement, not forced into one rule per object. C is wrong because invocable processes are reusable modular processes, not the main record-change automation container.

Answer : C

The correct answer is C. Add the standard Chatter feed component.

To add Chatter feed functionality to a custom object Lightning record page, the app builder should use the standard Chatter component in Lightning App Builder. Salesforce documentation states that the Feed component was renamed Chatter in Lightning App Builder and is used to place the publisher and feed combination on a record page.

A is incorrect because no custom Chatter feed component is required. B is incorrect because related lists do not add the Chatter feed. D is incorrect because the standard Chatter component is already available; an AppExchange component is unnecessary.

===========

Answer : A

Salesforce requires installation records to be directly associated with Opportunities, and sales reps need visibility of all installations tied to their Opportunities. A Master-Detail relationship is the correct solution because:

The Installation object (detail) inherits sharing and security from the Opportunity (master), ensuring sales reps see only their related installations.

Enables roll-up summaries on Opportunity if needed.

Salesforce documentation confirms that Master-Detail relationships provide parent-controlled ownership and access, making them ideal for enforcing related record visibility. (Salesforce Help)

B . Hierarchical is only available for User object.

C . Many-to-Many requires a junction object; not needed here.

D . Lookup allows optional, independent access; would not automatically enforce visibility.

===========