Get iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Practice Questions - Real and Updated

Answer : D

The testability of requirements is evaluated during the Test Analysis and Design stage of the fundamental test process3. The fundamental test process consists of five main activities:

Test Planning and Control: This activity involves defining the scope, objectives, approach, and resources for testing, as well as monitoring and controlling the test progress and results3.

Test Analysis and Design: This activity involves analyzing the test basis (such as requirements, design, etc.) and designing the test cases, procedures, and environment3.The testability of requirements is evaluated during this activity, as it involves checking the clarity, completeness, consistency, and testability of the requirements3.

Test Implementation and Execution: This activity involves implementing the test cases and procedures, preparing the test environment and data, executing the test cases, and logging the test results and incidents3.

Evaluating Exit Criteria and Reporting: This activity involves evaluating the test results against the exit criteria (such as coverage, defect rate, etc.) and reporting the test status and outcomes to the stakeholders3.

Test Closure Activities: This activity involves finalizing the test documentation, archiving the test artifacts, evaluating the test process and lessons learned, and releasing the test resources

Answer : A

A walkthrough is lead by a moderator and requires pre-meeting preparation and post meeting follow up is the statement that is not true about walkthroughs, because it describes a different type of review called inspection . A walkthrough is a type of informal review that involves the author of a document presenting it to a group of peers or stakeholders to establish a common understanding and to find possible defects . A walkthrough does not have a moderator, but rather an author who leads the review. A walkthrough does not require pre-meeting preparation or post meeting follow up, but rather relies on the author's knowledge and skills . The other options are true statements about walkthroughs. Option B is true, because a walkthrough may take the form of scenarios, dry runs and peer group review, depending on the type and purpose of the document being reviewed . Option C is true, because the purpose of a walkthrough is to establish common understanding of a document and to find possible defects in it . Option D is true, because pre-meeting preparation, documentation and distribution of results are optional for a walkthrough, as they depend on the author's discretion and preference .

Answer : D

Test analysis and design is the activity in the fundamental test process that includes identifying necessary test data.Test data are the inputs that are used to execute the test cases and verify the expected results2defines this activity as follows:

Test analysis and design has the following major tasks:

Reviewing the test basis (such as requirements, risk analysis reports, design documents or code).

Identifying test conditions based on analysis of test items, specifications, behavior and structure of the software.

Designing high-level test cases based on test conditions and designing techniques.

Evaluating testability of requirements and system under test.

Defining exit criteria.

Evaluating exit criteria and reporting (A) is part of the test closure activities, where the results of testing are evaluated against the defined objectives. Test implementation and execution (B) is where the test cases are executed using the identified test data and deviations from expected results are documented. Test planning and control is where the overall approach and resources for testing are defined and monitored.

Answer : C

Each review has clear defined objectives, the right people for the review objective are involved, and there is an emphasis on learning and process improvement are typically found to enable the review process to be successful1.A review is a type of static testing that involves the examination of software artifacts by humans to find defects, improve quality, or achieve other objectives1.A review process should have clear defined objectives that specify the purpose, scope, and expected outcomes of the review1.The right people for the review objective should be involved, such as reviewers, moderators, authors, managers, etc., who have the appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and roles to perform the review effectively1.There should also be an emphasis on learning and process improvement, as reviews can provide feedback and suggestions to improve the software artifacts, processes, and skills of the participants1. Therefore, these characteristics are typically found to enable the review process to be successful.

Answer : D

A test execution tool is a tool that executes tests on a software system and logs the outcomes of each test step. The ability of the tool to run the unit-level tests for the developers is one of the factors that should be considered when purchasing a test execution tool, as it can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of testing at this level. The other options are not relevant to test execution tools, but to other types of tools such as test management tools, test measurement tools, and requirements management tools. Reference:Section 6.1.1,Section 6.3.2