Get Cisco 300-510 Exam Dumps

Guidelines

This is a lab item in which tasks will be performed on virtual devices.

Refer to the Tasks tab to view the tasks for this lab item.

Refer to the Topology tab to access the device console(s) and perform the tasks.

Console access is available for all required devices by clicking the device icon or using the tab(s) above the console window.

All necessary preconfigurations have been applied.

Do not change the enable password or hostname for any device.

Save your configurations to NVRAM before moving to the next item.

Click Next at the bottom of the screen to submit this lab and move to the next question.

When Next is clicked, the lab doses and cannot be reopened.

Topology

Tasks

Configure and verify an OSPF neighbor adjacency between R1 and R2 in OSPF area 0 according to the topology to achieve these goals:

1. R1 pings the Loopback0 interface of R2. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.

2. R2 pings the Loopback0 interface of R1. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.

3. R2 receives a single summary route 172.16.100.0/22 for networks 172.16.100.0/24, 172.16.101.0/24, and 172.16.103.0/24.

Refer to the exhibit.

R2

Which type of BGP attribute does a route reflector attach to routes learned from iBGP peers that allows them to be accepted by other iBGP peers, thereby eliminating the need for a full-mesh BGP topology?

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer working for a private telecommunication company with an employee id: 4233:46:364 notices that the customer network going through AS30-AS65001-AS65000 is experiencing packet drops when it accesses an application at 172.16.20.1/32 In the DC cloud. The BGP link between AS20 and AS30 is inaccessible because of a fiber cut. Routers RL, RN, and RZ are configured with confederation identifier 10. Which action resolves this Issue?

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. This network is deployed with all connected links configured to run IS-IS. The routing protocol is enacted globally on each router, and the network engineer expects full routing Information to be shared among all routers. R5 is receiving routes from R4 but is missing routes from R1. Which action corrects the issue so that all routes are shared among the routers?