Get AGA CGFM Exam Dumps

Answer : B

What Are Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs)?

CAATs are specialized tools used in forensic accounting and auditing to analyze large volumes of data for patterns, anomalies, and irregularities that may indicate fraud.

These techniques help quantify the impact of fraud by identifying discrepancies, overpayments, or unaccounted transactions.

Why Are CAATs Used for Quantifying Fraud?

CAATs can efficiently analyze transactional data, calculate losses, and determine the extent of financial damage caused by fraud.

Examples include using software to detect duplicate payments, inflated invoices, or unauthorized transactions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A . Test of controls: Tests of controls evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls but do not quantify the impact of fraud.

C . Data integrity: Ensuring data integrity is important, but it does not specifically address quantifying fraud.

D . Benchmarking: Benchmarking compares performance metrics but does not analyze or quantify fraud.

Reference and Documents:

GAO Fraud Prevention Framework: Highlights the use of CAATs in forensic accounting.

AICPA Forensic Accounting Guidelines: Recommends CAATs for fraud detection and quantification.

Answer : C

Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR):

BPR focuses on redesigning key processes to achieve dramatic improvements in efficiency, effectiveness, and performance.

It typically involves addressing technical systems, human factors, and process workflows, but it does not involve redefining the organization's mission, which is a strategic activity outside the scope of BPR.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A . Key processes: Incorrect. Key processes are the primary focus of BPR.

B . Human environment: Incorrect. BPR often addresses human factors, such as roles and responsibilities.

C . Organizational mission: Correct. The mission is a strategic element and not typically redefined as part of process re-engineering.

D . Technical environment: Incorrect. BPR often involves rethinking technical systems and workflows.

Hammer & Champy, Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution.

GAO, Business Process Re-Engineering for Government Efficiency.

Answer : D, D

Collusion as a Threat to Monitoring:

Collusion occurs when two or more individuals work together to circumvent internal controls.

Even with strong controls in place, collusion can undermine monitoring because it allows individuals to bypass controls without detection.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A . Theft has occurred: Incorrect. While theft is a problem, it is often detected if controls and monitoring are functioning properly.

B Financial data is inaccurate: Incorrect. Inaccurate financial data can compromise decision-making, but strong monitoring can help detect and correct errors.

C . Performance data is inaccurate: Incorrect. While inaccurate performance data is problematic, it does not directly compromise the monitoring of financial control weaknesses.

GAO, Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book).

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), Fraud Risk Management Framework.

Answer : C

Definition of Cost-Effectiveness Measures:

Cost-effectiveness measures assess the relationship between inputs (resources used) and outcomes (results achieved) to determine whether a program delivers value for the resources invested.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A . Efficiency measures: Incorrect. These relate inputs to outputs, focusing on how efficiently resources are used to produce services, but not directly tied to outcomes.

B . Process measures: Incorrect. These measure activities or steps within a program but do not assess outcomes.

C . Cost-effectiveness measures: Correct. These directly link inputs to outcomes, measuring the program's effectiveness in achieving its objectives relative to costs.

GASB, Performance Measurement and Reporting for Government Programs.

GAO, Best Practices in Measuring Program Effectiveness.

Answer : D

Service Efforts and Accomplishments (SEA) Reporting:

SEA reporting is designed to provide non-financial performance information about the efficiency and effectiveness of government programs.

It evaluates how well resources are being used to achieve desired outcomes, helping stakeholders assess program performance and accountability.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A . Evaluation of the effects of changes in public policy: Incorrect. SEA reporting does not focus on policy changes but on program performance.

B . Assessment of financial condition and results of operations: Incorrect. This is the role of financial statements, not SEA reports.

C . Assessment of the accountability of the public administrators: Incorrect. While SEA reports indirectly support accountability, their main purpose is to assess program efficiency and effectiveness.

D . Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of governmental programs: Correct. This is the primary focus of SEA reporting.

GASB, Concepts Statement No. 2: Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting.

GFOA, Performance Reporting in Government.